Adaptations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to Agricultural Data Models with ELI5, PDPbox, and Skater using Diverse Agricultural Worker Data



Abstract Views
824

Downloads
650

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Nov 8, 2022
Published Dec 2, 2022
10.24018/ejai.2022.1.3.14

Abstract viewed = 824 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

We use explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based on Explain Like I’m 5 (ELI5), Partial Dependency Plot box (PDPbox), and Skater to analyze diverse physical agricultural (agri-) worker datasets. We have developed various promising body-sensing systems to enhance agri-technical advancement, training and worker development, and security. This includes wearable sensing systems (WSSs) that can capture real-time three-axis acceleration and angular velocity data related to agri-worker motion by analyzing human dynamics and statistics in different agri-environments, such as fields, meadows, and gardens. After investigating the obtained time-series data using a novel program written in Python, we discuss our findings and recommendations with real agri-workers and managers. In this study, we use XAI and visualization to analyze diverse data of experienced and inexperienced agri-workers to develop an applied method for agri-directors to train agri-workers.

Keywords: agricultural worker data, ELI5, explainable artificial intelligence, PDPbox, skater.

References

  1. Hariharan S, Rejimol Robinson, RR, Prasad RR, Thomas C, Balakrishnan N. XAI for intrusion detection system: comparing explanations based on global and local scope. Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques. 2022; 1–23.
     Google Scholar
  2. Kłosok M, Chlebus M. Towards better understanding of complex machine learning models using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Case of credit scoring modelling. University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences; 2020.
     Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal N, Das S. Interpretable machine learning tools: a survey. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). 2020; 1528–1534.
     Google Scholar
  4. Das A, Rad P. Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): A survey. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2006. 2020; 11371.
     Google Scholar
  5. Vollert S, Atzmueller M, Theissler A. Interpretable machine learning: A brief survey from the predictive maintenance perspective. Proceedings of 26th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). 2021; 1–8.
     Google Scholar
  6. Islam SR, Eberle W, Ghafoor SK, Ahmed M. Explainable artificial intelligence approaches: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.09429. 2021.
     Google Scholar
  7. Dindorf C, Konradi J, Wolf C, Taetz B, Bleser G, Huthwelker J, Fröhlich M. Classification and automated interpretation of spinal posture data using a pathology-independent classifier and explainable artificial intelligence (Xai). Sensors. 2021; 21(18): 23–63.
     Google Scholar
  8. Galhotra S, Pradhan R, Salimi B. Explaining black-box algorithms using probabilistic contrastive counterfactuals. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 577-590, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bücker M, Szepannek G, Gosiewska A, Biecek P. Transparency, auditability, and explainability of machine learning models in credit scoring. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2022; 73(1): 70–90.
     Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin NL, Nilsson SR, Choong JJ, Golden SA. Toward the explainability, transparency, and universality of machine learning for behavioral classification in neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2022; 73: 102544.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira LA, Guimarães FG, Silva R. Applying genetic programming to improve interpretability in machine learning models. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp. 1-8, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  12. Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020; 23(1), 18: 1–45.
     Google Scholar
  13. Li XH, Cao CC, ShiY, Bai W, Gao H, Qiu L, Chen L. A survey of data-driven and knowledge-aware explainable ai. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2020; 34(1): 29–49.
     Google Scholar
  14. Saeed W, Omlin C. Explainable ai (xai): A systematic meta-survey of current challenges and future opportunities. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2111.06420. 2021.
     Google Scholar
  15. Duval A. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). MA4K9 Scholarly Report, Mathematics Institute, The University of Warwick. 2019; 1–53.
     Google Scholar
  16. Lai V, Chen C, Liao QV, Smith-Renner A, Tan C. Towards a science of human-ai decision making: a survey of empirical studies. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11471. 2021.
     Google Scholar
  17. 行動Sharma S, Jagyasi B, Raval J, Patil P. AgriAcT: Agricultural Activity Training using multimedia and wearable sensing. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops). 2015; 439–444.
     Google Scholar
  18. Patil PA, Jagyasi BG, Raval J, Warke N, Vaidya PP. Design and development of wearable sensor textile for precision agriculture. Proceedings of IEEE 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), pp. 1-6, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  19. Kawakura S, Shibasaki R. Supporting systems for agricultural workers’ skill and security. Proceedings of Asian Association on Remote Sensing｜ACRS｜AARS 2013, pp. 71-77, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  20. Bao L. Physical Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data under Semi-Naturalistic Conditions. Master thesis at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston. unpublished officially; 2003.
     Google Scholar
  21. Karim F, Karim F. Monitoring system using web of things in precision agriculture. Procedia Computer Science. 2017; 110: 402–409.
     Google Scholar
  22. Pandey A, Tiwary P, Kumar S, Das SK. A hybrid classifier approach to multivariate sensor data for climate smart agriculture cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, pp. 337-341, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  23. Wang CH, Liu CY, Pan PN, Pan HR. Research into the E-learning model of agriculture technology companies: Analysis by deep learning. Agronomy. 2019; 9(2), 83: 1–16.
     Google Scholar
  24. Vigoroso LF, Caffaro C, Micheletti M, Cavallo E. Innovating Occupational Safety Training: A Scoping Review on Digital Games and Possible Applications in Agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4): 18–68.
     Google Scholar
  25. Nnaji C, Okpala I, Awolusi I. Wearable sensing devices: Potential impact & current use for incident prevention. Professional Safety. 2020; 65(4): 16–24.
     Google Scholar
  26. Taylor JET, Taylor GW. Artificial cognition: How experimental psychology can help generate explainable artificial intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2021; 28(2): 454–475.
     Google Scholar
  27. Anagnostis A, Benos L, Tsaopoulos D, Tagarakis A, Tsolakis N, Bochtis D. Human Activity Recognition through Recurrent Neural Networks for Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(5): 2188–2207.
     Google Scholar